@OrphanCrow your question is: What specific law is being challenged by this person that you claim is acting in civil disobedience?
1. The first is the 2 witness policy for verification within the congregation. Though in this instance his tactic I admit would fall short.
2. The fact that there are no laws for mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse in a large swath of legal jurisdictions when confessed to "clergy", which needs to be changed. If mandatory reporting was a law and it was enforced, it would force elders to contact the police, otherwise they themselves could be legally culpable.
@Orphancrow As a side note, Even Geoffery Jackson agreed with this. Thanks for the question @Orphancrow and keeping me in check! Also, I would like to concede your observation that my example's were not entirely parallel. However, I would like to put forth that Henry David Thoreau, MLK, nor Ghandi restricted the idea of Civil disobedience to breaking a specific law to show its absurdity and that the idea of civil disobedience has a much wider context than a tit for tat violation of a specific law in order to change that specific law. As a result of your insightful question, perhaps I should have used another phrase such as "non-violent resistance" or something to that effect. I appreciate your response and question!